Dr. Denise Jamieson, chief of the Center for Disease Control’s Women’s Health and Fertility Branch, acknowledged that the Zika virus will lead to difficult decisions for some expectant parents. What sort of decisions are these? Could it possibly involve “terminating a pregnancy”?
A little background first. The article in question explained what geographic areas are at the greatest risk and the birth defects resulting from this virus. It then quoted Dr. Jamieson who said, “Abortion is a legal medical procedure in the U.S., and in the context of Zika, couples need to make complex, highly personal decisions about their pregnancies.”1 So, the expedient way to deal with this disease is to kill the affected human? Despite its prevalence in today’s society, it is still unsettling to realize that some, perhaps many, parents do not want children with birth defects.
Sanger and Birth Control
Unfortunately, eradicating unwanted human qualities was Margaret Sanger’s philosophy. She founded the American Birth Control League in 1921 which eventually became Planned Parenthood.2 Her goal was to improve the world with birth control because it “is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives.”3 She also proposed that governments should “apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.”4
Planned Parenthood Morphs to Killing, Hitler 2.0
Surprisingly, as late as 1963, Planned Parenthood was opposed to abortion: “An abortion kills the life of the baby after it has begun.” But in December, 1971, George Langmyhr wrote: “We support the view that when an unwanted pregnancy has occurred, abortion services should be available, with the decision essentially being made by the patient and her doctor … . In summary, Planned Parenthood hopes that abortion will become even more available and supports the efforts of others in seeking reform and repeal of outdated laws.”5 It is likely that many parents, fearing possible birth defects from the Zika virus in their babies, will turn to PP to provide a Hitlerian “final solution” for the burden they wish to discard.6
This is the same organization which several ranking Democrats, including President Obama and Hillary Clinton, have expressed a strong loyalty for continuing its annual federal funding of just over $500 million.
But don’t they belong to a political party which professes inclusiveness and tolerance for all humans?
Democrats’ “Tolerance” Must be Granted
Obviously, there are qualifications before someone is eligible to receive “tolerance” from the Obama/ Clinton Party of Death. The most critical one is that a human not have a defect which would make him/her disposable at the hands of organizations like Planned Parenthood. The irony is that imperfect humans have seized the power of life and death over the most defenseless and most innocent of humans — the unborn.
Thus, we have the legal killing of those deemed undesirable. How is it that the United States of 2016 is like Germany of the 1930’s?
1 – “What You Need to Know About ZIKA + How to Beat the Virus – and the Mosquitoes that Carry It,” by Alexandra Sifferlin, Time magazine, May 16, 2016 issue.
2 – “Takedown,” by Paul Kengor, PhD, WND Books, Washington D.C., 2015, page 55.
3 – “Margaret Sanger Quotes, History, and Biography,” http://liveaction.org/research/margaret-sanger-quotes-history-and-biography
4 – “A Plan for Peace,” a summary of address before the New History Society, 1/17/1932 New York City as published in Birth Control Review, April 1932.
5 – “40 Years: Planned Parenthood Becomes Abortion Empire,” by Randall K. O’Bannon, PhD, National Right to Life News, Winter 2013, http://www.nrlc.org/archive/news/2013/201301/AbortionEmpirePage8.html#.V3_PXvkrKN0
6 – “The Nazis frequently used euphemistic language to disguise the true nature of their crimes. They used the term “Final Solution” to refer to their plan to annihilate the Jewish people.” From “‘Final Solution’: Overview,” https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005151