With presidential slogans like “Patriotism, Protection and Prosperity” (McKinley win in 1896), “Return to Normalcy” (Harding win in 1920), “Peace and Prosperity” (Eisenhower win in 1956), “He’s Making Us Proud Again” (Ford loss in 1976 defeated by Carter’s “Not Just Peanuts” that year), “America Needs a Change” (Mondale loss in 1984), “Prosperity for America’s Families” (Gore loss in 2000), and “Let America be America Again” (Kerry loss in 2004)1 being promoted without anyone being outraged, how does Trump’s “Make America Great Again” cause such disturbances?
The problem is that the U.S. is, as President Trump said in the 2016 campaign, no longer as great as it used to be and it has little to do with racial battles as we have had them strewn throughout most of our country’s history unfortunately.
How can a nation call itself great when 60 million babies have been killed legally in the last 46 years under a Supreme Court decision on the totally unrelated issue of “privacy”? President Trump started us back on the path to decency with his early executive order stopping the use of U.S. taxpayers’ funds for abortions elsewhere. Changing the acceptance of this inhumane practice stateside will be more difficult.
A great nation doesn’t allow its military decline to the point where the Administration says “we lead from behind” or “draws a red line in Syria” then implements no consequences when it’s crossed.
How can a nation call itself great when it re-elects a
president who lied about his State Department’s incompetence which led to the
torture and murder of four embassy staff in Benghazi in order to stave off a
challenge by his opponent in the close 2012 election?
A great nation doesn’t abdicate its responsibility for assisting infirmed veterans or dismiss IRS harassment of those who disagree with the Administration as having “not a smidge of evidence” when the opposite was obvious.
A hallmark of a great nation doesn’t include forcing doomed
and mislabeled “affordable health care” on its population with the lie that
“you can keep your doctors and insurance” when neither is true and was known by
its architects from the beginning.
Compounding the pain of this falsehood is the net result that demagogues
in Congress now say “Medicare for All” is the only solution as insurance
company losses increase and many retired couples too young for Medicare are
paying $15,000-$20,000 annually for far less coverage than for those they are
now subsidizing at their expense. Socialized
medicine is never the answer to those familiar with world history. 2
Let’s not forget education. The parents are the primary educators of their children and have the right to decide how they are educated.3 A great nation does not erode parental rights with increasing arrogance as we borrow from the philosophy of the former Soviet Union.4,5
This is just a tip of the iceberg about to hit the U.S.S. America. Could it be that MAGA is being disparaged because it dared to criticize a Democrat president who is also a member of a minority? If Trump had adopted Democrat Kerry’s “Let America be America Again” would members of his staff be assaulted in public?
Probably, because Trump and his followers believe in the dignity of human life and a respect for the Ten Commandments and Natural Law. Those values are opposed to the socialist and global government crowd. Read Marx & Engels, Fourier & Owen, Sanger, Alinsky, Soros and new UK laws on “hate speech” and it becomes ominously clear. 6,4,7,8,9,10
1 – https://www.presidentsusa.net/campaignslogans.html
2 – “There
seems to be a myth that all medical care, procedures and drugs are free under a
socialized system. Although Britons do have affordable access to primary-care
doctors, and everyone in the UK is covered through high taxes, they are
subjected to extensive waiting periods for specialists, surgeries and
hospitalization. The fact is that in the West, as the ability of physicians to
provide services becomes stretched, many patients die waiting for treatment….
“The [Romanian] system was ‘first come, first served.’ Everyone received a number and waited, as at a food counter, to see a medical professional. Sitting on the floor was forbidden; sometimes we would be forced to stand for an entire day – occasionally until nightfall – before being examined by an overworked doctor, who supplemented his “egalitarian” income with monetary or material bribes from patients seeking quicker access and better care. After performing a perfunctory examination, the doctor would give us a prescription and send us away. The trouble was that the pharmacy in the nearby shopping complex had as little stock on its shelves as every other store in the country. The pharmacist, who had no ingredients with which to prepare the antibiotic the doctor had prescribed, would simply shrug, and continue to earn his state income for doing nothing.
my mother and I would return home empty-handed, my father would go out to find
the medication on the black market, paying at least ten times the official
price to obtain it. In spite of the
harsh sentences presented to sellers and buyers on the black market, many were
willing to take the risk — and extremely grateful. It was the only way to fill the prescription,
which was supposed to be free in the communist ‘paradise’….
millennials, a majority of whom seem to believe in ideological social
experiments that may have failed broadly elsewhere, have no clue about the
literal and figurative bitter pill that people living under socialist and
communist regimes are forced to swallow — not only where health care is
“Rather than rejecting the basic free-market principles of the US economy — as a 2016 Harvard University survey found that most do — these young Americans would do well to ask themselves why it is that so many people from countries with socialized medicine flock to the United States for treatment.”
From “Socialized Medicine: A Dose of Reality,” by Ileana Johnson, https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/12102/socialized-medicine, 3/31/2018.
3 – “… ‘The role
of parents in education is of such importance that it is almost impossible
to provide an adequate substitute.’ The
right and the duty of parents to educate their children are primordial and
inalienable…. “The state may not legitimately usurp the initiatives of the
spouses, who have the primary responsibility for the procreation and education
of their children…” Taken from
paragraphs 2221 and 2372 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, second
edition, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, twenty-fifth printing, November 2013.
4 – “This thinking on education would dominate communist societies. One Soviet official, writing in the 1980’s, would state emphatically that under communism, the ‘school becomes literally a home.’
also what Charles Fourier and Robert Owen desired. They wanted public schools and communal
enclaves to replace the father and mother as the primary educators and shapers
of society’s children. (This, of course,
would be forcibly done in brute fashion in certain Asian communist experiments,
such as China and Cambodia, where it produced unprecedentedly deadly
results.) Weikart noted: ‘Owen’s
continual emphasis on the role of education in shaping and individual’s
character and outlook lent urgency to his appeal for the abolition of the
family, since only by removing children from their supposedly irrational and
deleterious influence of parents could he hope to alter society.’” .” From page 24 of “Takedown,” by Paul Kengor
PhD, WND Books, Washington D.C., 2015.
5 – “Or consider the state of New York, which apparently has
determined that, while homeschooling is clearly not against the law, it is also
not to be tolerated. Mother Kiarre Harris decided in December 2016 to
remove her two children from Buffalo’s failing schools. Per state law, she filed all of the required
paperwork with Buffalo City Hall and told the school she was beginning to
homeschool the youngsters. A few weeks
later, Child Protective Services and the police showed up to take her kids.
When she wouldn’t reveal where the children were, she was arrested and jailed
on obstruction charges, while her children were located and taken to foster
“Home School Legal Defense Association recently filed suit against New York for routinely doing this very thing: charging ‘truancy’ and taking children away from parents who have fulfilled all of the statutory requirements to teach their children at home. New York law permits parents to choose this educational alternative, but the state’s message is clear: if you make that choice, we will fabricate a reason to take your child.” From “Special Report: The State of Parental Rights in America, 2017,” https://parentalrights.org/sopra17/#education, 2/20/2017.
6 – “As [Richard] Weikart puts it, Marx and Engels believed that the abolition of private property and the integration of socialism would bring in their wake an inevitable dissolution of the family. It was as if communism would come first and the disappearance, or ‘abolition,’ of the family would follow in due course. Weikart contrasts this with Charles Fourier and Robert Owen, who saw abolition of the family as a precursor to their utopian vision ‘as part and parcel of their socialists proposals to ameliorate society.’…. Even if Marx and Engels thought that marriage and family would ‘wither away’ in their utopia, this was something that pleased them. They wanted this withering away, this vanishing. It was an outcome they welcomed with great enthusiasm. They intended to promote the outcome.” From pages 22 and 23 of “Takedown,” by Paul Kengor PhD, WND Books, Washington D.C., 2015.
7 – “The object of
civilization is to obtain the highest and most splendid culture of which
humanity is capable. But such attainment
is unthinkable if we continue to breed form the present race stock that yields
us our largest amount of progeny. Some
method must be devised to eliminate the degenerate and the defective; for these
act constantly to impede progress and ever increasingly drag down the human
race. This is especially the case in the
nations which have reached the highest degree of civilization, for it is just
in these nations that the degenerate and defective are enabled to produce the
largest number of progeny.” From “A
Better Race Through Birth Control,” by Margaret Sanger, Nov. 1923, https://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/webedition/app/documents/show.php?sangerDoc=306638.xml
8 – “The fourth rule [of tactics] is: Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.
“The fourth rule carries within it the fifth rule: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also, it infuriates the opposition , who then react to your advantage….
“The twelfth rule: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. You cannot risk being trapped by the enemy in his sudden agreement with your demand and saying ‘You’re right — we don’t know what to do about this issue. Now you tell us.’
“The thirteenth rule: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”
From pages 128 and 130 of “Rules For Radicals,” by Saul Alinsky, Vintage Books (a division of Random House), New York, copyright 1971, October 1989 edition.
9 – “The
Soros-globalist agenda here is simple and fairly transparent. In essence, Soros
and various European governments are tired of pastors from the Georgian
Orthodox Church warning their flocks about the dangers of surrendering their
sovereignty and right to self-government to the increasingly radical EU
super-state. And so, they are using Soros money and taxpayer funds to “train”
the pastors in how to love the EU and promote it to their trusting
“In the real world, of
course, the EU has become infamous for showering taxpayer funds on the radical
abortion lobby, programs to sexualize young children with pornographic “sex
education,” and pro-homosexual groups, even those linked to the promotion of pedophilia.
The EU and its kangaroo “courts” have also been usurping ever broader powers
over practically everything, including the family. In fact, the EU has even
ordered national governments to criminalize free speech and conscript
journalists into the war on traditional marriage and family values — under
threat of prison in some places.
addition to Soros, much of the propaganda for Georgian priests is financed by
EU governments that are rabidly opposed to traditional marriage and even go so
far as to imprison people for expressing the biblical view that homosexual acts
are a sin….
“Like the situation in Ukraine, where Soros was also a key player, globalists are trying to deceive the people of Georgia into a false choice — the notion that they must either surrender their nation to the authoritarian EU regime, or to Vladimir Putin’s supposedly similarly autocratic, sovereignty-shredding “integration” scheme known as the Eurasian Union. In short, heads, Georgia loses; tails, globalists win. But it is a false choice. The people of Georgia could simply retain their sovereignty and avoid entangling alliances with either super-state.”
From “Soros Co-opting Churches To Push New World Order,” by Alex Newman of the New American, 4/5/2016, http://orthochristian.com/92200.html
10 – “To “defeat” terrorist organizations, [UK Prime Minister David] Cameron told the assembled UN member regimes — at least some of which sponsor terrorism, according to Western governments — their ‘ideology’ must be defeated in ‘all its forms.’ As examples of ideas in the global terror war’s crosshairs, the embattled U.K. leader pointed to theories about the 9/11 and 7/7 London terror attacks that do not conform to the widely questioned official government narratives. Religious prophecies Cameron called ‘nonsense’ should also be disallowed, he told his counterparts at the UN….
“In the United Kingdom, though, as The New American has documented, the war on speech and ideas the government disapproves of already extends well beyond self-styled Muslim terrorists and violent criminals. Among others in the crosshairs: Christians who quote the Bible, pro-life activists, and even people who question or reject imploding anthropogenic ‘global-warming’ theories. In recent years, for instance, U.K. authorities have prosecuted thousands of British subjects merely for what they say online, using vague laws purporting to criminalize ‘insulting’ or ‘offensive’ comments.
In late 2012, an atheist who ripped up a Koran was prosecuted for ‘causing religiously aggravated intentional harassment, alarm or distress, by demonstrating hostility based on membership of a particular religious group.’ Before that, a 20-year-old Muslim was prosecuted and convicted for saying on Facebook that British troops should “die and go to hell” for their actions in Afghanistan. Numerous Christian street preachers have been jailed for describing homosexual activity as sinful. One man, the leader of the Liberty GB Party, was arrested for ‘hate speech’ after quoting Winston Churchill, facing a potential two-year prison sentence.
“Even a harmless octogenarian, Edward Atkinson, has been relentlessly persecuted for his peaceful pro-life activism on behalf of unborn children, going to jail on multiple occasions merely for sending information to abortionists. ‘I was trying to tell her about the abortion holocaust, all the murdered babies, but she couldn’t face the truth apparently, so she went to the police and got me arrested,’ the soft-spoken pensioner told The New American in an interview after one of his arrests for sending images of aborted children to a hospital. ‘We’re living in a country where all the laws have been inverted.’”
From “UK Launches War on ‘Non-Violent’ Extremism, Seeking UN Help,” by Alex Newman, The New American, 10/3/2014, https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/19245-u-k-launches-war-on-non-violent-extremism-seeking-un-help